Attached
is a picture of the front cover of a book which I read recently. You will
recognise the face on the front from a previous post. In it, the author,
Richard Patterson, explains why he thinks that Francis Thompson was Jack the
Ripper. I had not accessed the full force of his arguments when I wrote Black
Hearts And Blue Devils but now that I have, I amĀ pleasedĀ that I chose this particular character to be
one of the Black Hearts of my title!
If any of you are "ripperologists" and
have not read Patterson's book I can recommend it for its research and
conclusions (although it could have done with a better proof-reader). After
finishing the book, I personally am just about 100 per cent convinced that
Thompson was the ripper. Patterson's reasoning is persuasive enough in and of
itself, but I also read a ripper book by Thomas Toughill ('The Ripper Code',
2008) which persuades me further: Toughill's book points the finger not at
Thompson but at an artist friend of Oscar Wilde - but it is the Wilde
connection that I think is important. Toughill's thesis is that Wilde
knew/suspected the identity of Jack the Ripper and left hints in his works; and
what intrigues me is that Wilde almost certainly knew Thompson - both moved in
the same literary and artistic circles; Thompson was an obsessive Roman
Catholic, a religion with which Wilde is said to have had a long-standing
'flirtation'; and Wilde certainly knew Thompson's publisher, Wilfrid Meynell,
with whom he also corresponded (it is Patterson's contention that Meynell, also
a Roman Catholic, suspected Thompson of being the Ripper, but covered it up).
So, just think. Perhaps Abe Lively could have
prevented the Whitechapel murders!
Post Views : 149